It was a night of several ironies and
coincidences. As Arjuna Ranatunga played his trademark late cut to guide the
ball to the third man boundary, Tony Greig, the converted supporter of Sri
Lanka’s cricket, couldn’t hide his joy. “That’s it. All the way, to the
boundary for four; what a victory for the Sri Lankans….” he announced to the
entire world. He was spot on. What a victory for the Sri Lankans it was.
Sri Lanka’s World Cup victory in 1996
is an unmatched achievement in her sporting annals. It was unbelievable. Who in
their right mind would have imagined Sri Lanka winning the World Cup in
1996?The sweet irony of the whole story is the Australian contribution to Sri
Lanka’s victory. In 1995, just before the World Cup, Sri Lanka had the rare
fortune of touring Australia. It was the time when the Sri Lankan team was
reaching its peak performances in years. They had already recorded their first
test victory on foreign soil and had also done well in several limited over
tournaments. Therefore, Sri Lanka became a prime target for Australian
‘psychological warfare.’ To the disappointment of the Aussies, they had met
their match in the form of Arjuna Ranatunga.
When the ‘no-ball’ allegations were
brought against Muttiah Muralitharan, Ranatunga rallied his team for the
defence of his ace spinner, and the whole nation followed him. With the whole
team and the nation united against the ‘common opposition,’ Sri Lanka became
even a stronger threat than she used to be. All divisions evaporated in the
face of this blatant challenge to an upcoming star.
Sri Lankan cricket team was not doing
well initially in the Benson and Hedges World Series during this tour. This
turned out to be a blessing in disguise. Desperate for a new strategy, the Sri
Lankan team asked Romesh Kaluvitharana to open batting with Sanath Jayasuriya
and sent Roshan Mahanama down the order. This surprise move proved to be a
masterstroke of strategy. The duo Sanath (“master blaster”) and Kalu (“the
little dynamite”) entirely transformed one day cricket. What they initiated in
Australia came to a zenith during the World Cup a few weeks later. In doing so,
they won many admirers, among them Tony Greig. Meanwhile, Mahanama, who was
struggling at the top order, found his form back and gave added stability to
the middle order.
With the attack on Murali unsuccessful,
Australia launched another campaign to smear Sri Lanka’s reputation. Citing
security reasons, Australia and West Indies refused to come to Sri Lanka to
compete with the local team during the preliminary round in the World cup. The
Central bank bombing helped them to press the issue. But the Indian and
Pakistani authorities came to Sri Lanka’s assistance, sending a joint team to
play an exhibition match to prove that the Australian allegations were baseless.
This was a rare case of South Asian solidarity, in the face of a “common
opponent.”
Pakistan had a grudge against the
Australians. In 1994, when their team was in top form, it was three Australian
players who brought allegations of match fixing against the then Pakistani
captain, Saleem Malik. This ended the team’s good fortunes for a few years to
come. In this way, Australia may have helped the Sri Lankan cause. If Pakistan
had kept on their good form, they had a very good chance of repeating their success
of 1992, especially as the tournament was being played in the subcontinent.
After cruising along the first round, thrashing the mighty Indians and the hapless Kenyans on the way, Sri Lanka pulled out a spectacular victory in the first Semi Final against India at Eden Gardens. After losing both the opening pair and Asanka Gurusinghe cheaply, they found a hero in Aravinda De Silva. He played some elegant boundaries and faced up to the challenge as if his team had lost no wickets. Ranatunga and Mahanama steered the middle order once again. Under the lights, Indians started well, but after Tendulkar was dismissed, things turned upside down. Jayasuriya, who failed with the bat, was making amends with the ball and in the field as he captured three wickets for twelve and took two catches. This performance earned him the Most Valuable Player award for the tournament even before the final.
Ironically, the second Semi Final was to be played between the two teams who had refused to come to Sri Lanka for the first round matches. As the Australian captain remarked, the West Indians won 95 percent of the match but lost it in the end. Therefore, Sri Lanka was destined to play their ‘arch enemy’ in the final at Lahore.
This match must have been the only major instance when the Pakistanis packed into a cricket stadium to support another team. Sri Lankans must have never felt that they were playing in foreign soil. The images of those supporters, carrying Sri Lankan flags and cheering the players on was a once in a life time experience. If the opposition was not Australia, this support would not have been this intense. By getting selected to the final the Aussies had ensured total crowd support to Sri Lanka. They had lost half the match even before it got underway.
They lost the other half when Aravinda De Silva joined the solid Gurusinghe in the Sri Lankan reply to Australia’s 241/7. The explosive opening pair had been sent back to the pavilion very early in the innings but Gurusinghe and De Silva had no plans of following their example soon. They built a steady partnership. Dew started falling, which made fielding a very hard endeavour. All bowlers, including Shane Warne, were given the same treatment. After Gurusinghe’s dismissal the captain came to the middle and guided his team to victory with his deputy. De Silva scored a memorable century and Ranatunga scored the winning runs. This was the culmination of a difficult voyage which started abruptly on Boxing Day 1995, when an Australian umpire called Murali for chucking. With their “psychological warfare” against both Pakistan and Sri Lanka, Australians gave unintended assistance to Sri Lanka to lift the World Cup in 1996.
No comments:
Post a Comment